Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)

From: Juraj Panko <Juraj.Panko@TUKE.SK>
Subject: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 14:43:28 +0200

Next Article (by Date): Re: Casova pasma Jirka Prchal
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Linux? K cemu? Honza Kostal
Top of Thread: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?) Cheben Michal
Next in Thread: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?) Eduard Vopicka
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Subject]

                        Deahi networkers !
According to Eduard Vopicka.
> On Mar 30, 11:58am, Petr Snajdr wrote:
> } Subject: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)
> } > Jakykoli viceulohovy system pro PC je tezke provozovat na 2M pameti.
> } > Vcetne Novell DOSu (aspon mi to nekdo rikal...).
> }    2 ulohy bezici soucasne = min.4MB RAM :-((((
> }    ,ale oproti MS je i to pokrok.
 
> Pokud myslite skutecne 4MB a ne .4 nebo .04 MB, tak to asi zase az tak
> velky pokrok nebude. Na 386/40 se 4MB RAM uz vam pobezi Linux i s X-win,
> takze tam urcite pobezi o hodne vice uloh nez 2. Ano, zejmena pri startu
> tech X to bude line, ale pak to pobezi snesitelne.
 
> Je to fantasticke, kam ten svet speje. Drive na necelem 1/4 MB mohlo pracovat
> i 10 nebo 12 lidi, dneska dve ulohy na pocitaci pro jednoho cloveka vyzaduji
> 4MB. To je fakt nebo legrace, kdyz mame ted kolem toho Apr 1?
Hmmm, ale kolkoze to stalo tych 1/4 MB. My sme na UVT vyradili v minulom
roku pocitace za asi 54 milionov (v skolach sa majetok neodpisuje - vyradzuju
sa pocitace s ich nadobudacou hodnotou). Bolo to zaopar SMEP-iek :-(
> Eduard Vopicka
--
*******************
Juraj Panko
panko@ccsun.tuke.sk
*******************

Go to listserv.cesnet.cz LWGate Home Page.