Go to listserv.cesnet.cz LWGate Home Page.From: Daniel Docekal <daniel@MAIL.CODALAN.CZ>
Subject: Re: Dotaz na kvalitu a zkusenosti s MAIL602 3.0
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 11:12:43 EST
Next Article (by Date): Najde se nejaky named/DNS guru? Daniel Docekal
Previous Article (by Date): Re: FIDO NET Stanislav Kolar
Top of Thread: Dotaz na kvalitu a zkusenosti s MAIL602 3.0 Martin Kamin
Next in Thread: Re: Dotaz na kvalitu a zkusenosti s MAIL602 3.0 Richard Drutarovsky
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Subject]
On Wed, 13 Dec 1995 08:13:08 +0100 you wrote: >> kdyz poslu nekomu svoji zpravu a zaroven monitoruji jeho mail directory, >> hned si ji tam vyzvednu zakodovanou a mam tedy jak zdroj tak cil. A to je >> docela dobry zacatek pro louskani toho sifrovani a muze ho udelat kazdy i >> bez znalosti jakychkoliv sitovych protokolu. > >ALe prave o tom je diskusia, preco sa nam postove systemy odlisne od M602 >zdaju mat o jeden stupen ochrany viac (nevravim ze su o stupen bezpecnejsie). Ano, zejmena SMTP protokol a POP3 protokol - velice bezpecne protokoly. Boze muj, o cem to tu jeste debatujete? * Daniel Docekal, Computer Data a.s., Trebohosticka 2283 * 100 00 Praha 10, Tel. 42-2-7078325, Fax. 42-2-703875 * e-mail, daniel@mail.codalan.cz, or codalan@login.cz * http://www.codalan.cz, ftp://www.codalan.cz
Next Article (by Date): Najde se nejaky named/DNS guru? Daniel Docekal
Previous Article (by Date): Re: FIDO NET Stanislav Kolar
Top of Thread: Dotaz na kvalitu a zkusenosti s MAIL602 3.0 Martin Kamin
Next in Thread: Re: Dotaz na kvalitu a zkusenosti s MAIL602 3.0 Richard Drutarovsky
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Subject]