Re: QNX


From: Science Systems CR <scisys@SCISYS.ANET.CZ>
Subject: Re: QNX
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:12:58 GMT+1

Next Article (by Subject): Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: QNX (Re: "Zly" Gates (Re: Windows95 aneb kam se podel DOS?) Jan Kasprzak
Next in Thread: Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


> Date:          Mon, 5 Feb 1996 12:34:33 +0100
 
[ ... ]
 
>
>         Doporucoval bych zacit u news:comp.os.qnx. Jako OS pro aplikace
> v realnem case je QNX dobry, ale bezny UN*Xovy vykon tohoto systemu
> je _velmi_ slaby (treba prepinani kontextu, propustnost roury, ...).
>
> -Yenya
>
 
Hmmm. Toto je myslim _velmi_ odvazne tvrzeni. Mohl byste prosim
dolozit, jak jste k tomuto zaveru dosel?
Jinak to vypada takto (verze 4.22):
 
            Context [microsec]     Interrupt latency [microsec]
P133           3.1                        4.3
P100           3.9                        4.4
486DX4         5.1                        4.9
386/33        25                         14
 
S pozdravem
 
Martin Pechanec
 
   +---------+
-- | science | ------------------------------------------------------
   | systems |  > Custom software, system integration, networking <
   +---------+  > real-time control systems, information systems  <
 
 Science Systems CR                     Phone: +42 2 361000
 Evropska 61                                   +42 2 361001
 160 00 Praha 6                           Fax: +42 2 361934
 Czech Republic, Europe                e-mail: scisys@scisys.anet.cz
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Next Article (by Subject): Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: QNX (Re: "Zly" Gates (Re: Windows95 aneb kam se podel DOS?) Jan Kasprzak
Next in Thread: Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to listserv.cesnet.cz LWGate Home Page.