From: Science Systems CR <scisys@SCISYS.ANET.CZ>
Subject: Re: QNX
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 10:12:58 GMT+1
Next Article (by Subject): Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: QNX (Re: "Zly" Gates (Re: Windows95 aneb kam se podel DOS?) Jan Kasprzak
Next in Thread: Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 12:34:33 +0100 [ ... ] > > Doporucoval bych zacit u news:comp.os.qnx. Jako OS pro aplikace > v realnem case je QNX dobry, ale bezny UN*Xovy vykon tohoto systemu > je _velmi_ slaby (treba prepinani kontextu, propustnost roury, ...). > > -Yenya > Hmmm. Toto je myslim _velmi_ odvazne tvrzeni. Mohl byste prosim dolozit, jak jste k tomuto zaveru dosel? Jinak to vypada takto (verze 4.22): Context [microsec] Interrupt latency [microsec] P133 3.1 4.3 P100 3.9 4.4 486DX4 5.1 4.9 386/33 25 14 S pozdravem Martin Pechanec +---------+ -- | science | ------------------------------------------------------ | systems | > Custom software, system integration, networking < +---------+ > real-time control systems, information systems < Science Systems CR Phone: +42 2 361000 Evropska 61 +42 2 361001 160 00 Praha 6 Fax: +42 2 361934 Czech Republic, Europe e-mail: scisys@scisys.anet.cz ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Next Article (by Subject): Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: QNX (Re: "Zly" Gates (Re: Windows95 aneb kam se podel DOS?) Jan Kasprzak
Next in Thread: Re: QNX Zdenek Salvet
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]