user maxx

Matus Uhlar uhlar at ccnews.ke.sanet.sk
Fri Sep 20 15:54:00 CEST 1996


At 19 Sep 1996 19:31:19 +0200 Jan Schmidt <schmidt at cs.felk.cvut.cz> wrote:
-> Ne ta zcela. Je nutno mit na tom drate stroj, ktery dovoli promiskuitni
-> prijem (jedna-li se o sdilene medium, tedy ethernet). Slusne
-> zadministrovany Unix by to dovolit nemel. Tam byva promiskuitni
-> rozhrani zvlast (/dev/nit v SunOS), ke kteremu se da zatlouci pristup.
-> Ovsem pececka jsou pravou pohromou. Da se vyrobit hardwarova
-> ochrana, monitorujici nastaveni prislusnych registru ethernet
-> karty, a pak uz to zalezi jen na tom, jak dobre jsou utazeny/zavareny
-> srouby od krytu :-)

nebolo by mozne robit ethernet karty tak aby zachytavali len pakety
urecen pre nick a broadcast ? Teraz by to asi uz nemalo zmysel, ale preco
karta vlastne chyta vsetko ?

inac na solarise tu mam program snoop ktory zachytava vsetky pakety na
ethernete :) co na to poviete ?

ked sa s nim pohram (a to som uz raz robil) zachytim telo kazdeho a pokojne
mozem pozriet aka posta ide medzi dvoma pocitacmi...
--
 Matus Uhlar, sysadm at Regional node of SANET in Kosice, Slovakia
 E-mail: Matus.Uhlar at tuke.sk WWW: http://ccsun.tuke.sk/users/uhlar
 IRC: fantomas, uhlar   PGP: finger uhlar at ccnews.ke.sanet.sk | pgp
 The 3 biggest disasters: Hiroshima 45, Tchernobyl 86, Windows 95



More information about the net mailing list