From: Jiri Novotny <novotny@MUNI.CZ>
Subject: Re: Internet + file server
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 11:36:05 +0100
Next Article (by Date): Re: Ochranna znamka UN*X Eduard Vopicka
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Internet + file server Zdenek Maruna
Top of Thread: Internet + file server Jiri Novotny
Next in Thread: Re: Internet + file server Zdenek Maruna
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Subject]
> Myslim, ze pro praci pod DOSem je rychlejsi NFS, zatimco pro Windows je
> rychlejsi WFW (s 32 bitovym sitovym driverem) + NT.
> Jestli na stanici bezi Windows pomalu i lokalne bez site (a jsou skutecne
> optimalne nakonfigurovane) tak uz je zadna sit nezrychli.
>
> Rad bych pro vlastni informaci mereni doplnil porovnanim rychlosti s Windows
> nad Unixovou siti, pripadne emulaci Windows po Linuxem. Nasel by se nekdo,
> kdo ma 486 50 MHz a 8 MB jako ja abychom se domluvili na porovnavacich testech
?
>
Ano, mam na stole 486/33MHz s 8Mb, mam na tom i Windows a disky mohu
montovat pres NFS na 486/(tusim ze 50Mhz) s BSD/OS, dale na SUN IPX
a SUN 10.
J. Novotny
Next Article (by Date): Re: Ochranna znamka UN*X Eduard Vopicka
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Internet + file server Zdenek Maruna
Top of Thread: Internet + file server Jiri Novotny
Next in Thread: Re: Internet + file server Zdenek Maruna
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Subject]