Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)

From: Eduard Vopicka <Eduard.Vopicka@VSE.CZ>
Subject: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 1995 13:21:22 +0200

Next Article (by Date): Re: Linux? K cemu? Petr Snajdr
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Linux? K cemu? Eduard Vopicka
Top of Thread: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?) Cheben Michal
Next in Thread: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?) Juraj Panko
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Subject]

On Mar 30, 11:58am, Petr Snajdr wrote:
} Subject: Re: WIN on Herc (was: Linux? K cemu?)
} > Jakykoli viceulohovy system pro PC je tezke provozovat na 2M pameti.
} > Vcetne Novell DOSu (aspon mi to nekdo rikal...).
}
}    2 ulohy bezici soucasne = min.4MB RAM :-((((
}
}    ,ale oproti MS je i to pokrok.
}
}  Petr Snajdr
}-- End of excerpt from Petr Snajdr
 
Pokud myslite skutecne 4MB a ne .4 nebo .04 MB, tak to asi zase az tak
velky pokrok nebude. Na 386/40 se 4MB RAM uz vam pobezi Linux i s X-win,
takze tam urcite pobezi o hodne vice uloh nez 2. Ano, zejmena pri startu
tech X to bude line, ale pak to pobezi snesitelne.
 
Je to fantasticke, kam ten svet speje. Drive na necelem 1/4 MB mohlo pracovat
i 10 nebo 12 lidi, dneska dve ulohy na pocitaci pro jednoho cloveka vyzaduji
4MB. To je fakt nebo legrace, kdyz mame ted kolem toho Apr 1?
 
Eduard Vopicka
 
 
--
"Eduard Vopicka, Computing Centre, Prague University of Economics,
W. Churchill Square 4, CZ 130 67 Prague 3" <Eduard.Vopicka@vse.cz>

Go to listserv.cesnet.cz LWGate Home Page.