From: Matus Uhlar <uhlar@CCNEWS.KE.SANET.SK>
Subject: Re: priorita (Re: Omluva)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 16:02:16 +0200
Next Article (by Date): Re: Vyhodnoceni: Barevna hloubka Martin MICHAL
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Vyhodnoceni: Barevna hloubka Vodicka Petr
Top of Thread: priorita (Re: Omluva) Bohumil Chalupa
Next in Thread: Re: priorita (Re: Omluva) Petr Kolar
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
In cz.net.csinfo Bohumil Chalupa <bochal@APOLLO.KARLOV.MFF.CUNI.CZ> wrote: -> > In cz.net.csinfo Bohumil Chalupa <bochal@APOLLO.KARLOV.MFF.CUNI.CZ> wrote: -> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -> Ja jsem to napsal do csinfo-l a za nejakou p...... branu ja nemuzu... to je gateway do newsov... takze to mate rovnake. imho sa diskusne kluby citaju ovela lepsie cez newsy... -> At je to treba chyba, ale je, myslim, dost rozsirena. Proto povazuji -> za nanejvys vhodne, aby se v dopisech s normalni (nebo nizkou) prioritou -> radka 'Priority:' nevyskytovala. nuz je fakt ze priority: normal je dokonale zbytocny riadok. Ale chyby by sa mali napravat aj tak... -- E-mail: Matus.Uhlar@tuke.sk WWW: http://ccsun.tuke.sk/users/uhlar IRC: fantomas, TALK: uhlar@ccnews.ke.sanet.sk ...and if you think I'm talking for my employer, you're wrong...
Next Article (by Date): Re: Vyhodnoceni: Barevna hloubka Martin MICHAL
Previous Article (by Date): Re: Vyhodnoceni: Barevna hloubka Vodicka Petr
Top of Thread: priorita (Re: Omluva) Bohumil Chalupa
Next in Thread: Re: priorita (Re: Omluva) Petr Kolar
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]